How many of us have given importance to the theory part of this practically used skill? In fact hardly any of us.
and how important can this be?
Not very for a performer. But for a teacher and a performer it stands as an asset. Knowledgeable about the theory of dance leads you to impress people around you about dance, as an art. To draw laymen towards this so-called 'forbidden' art form.
The Natya Sastra - the bible for dance- describes saying, "dance only for those who appreciate and understand dance language, don't try to educate laymen into this."
What a statement in the very book dancers worship, I first thought. But later realized the significance of it. People who are not yet ready for this kind of art can never be easily tempted into enjoying a program. they find no pleasure in this. I don't understand then how can they enjoy a 3 hour movie which has the same story line, similar lyrics, similar action as a dance! It wonders me!
Natya sastra has 6000 sutras in 36 chapters covering explanations about dance and drama. This is book was coded by Bharata Muni, in 200 B.C. This book explains about dance and drama and of course there are several others from which dance was re-created. Why I call it as re-created is because dancing was a lot different from what it was before this theory was given its due significance.
After interpreting the verses in these books, many eminent reformers beautified the dance form.
I would like to write a lot about Natya Satra but I will save it for forthcoming posts. As you would have noticed, the book has been written during 200 BC, and now we are at 2012, should anybody doubt if the book could be outdated?! I wouldn't deny any person posing this question. What was written then has now become a common-sense, has become just another part of dance now.
People have diligently followed the rules and regulations/ descriptions written in the book for centuries that today it is not a new information. Considering this, probably we should adopt Natya Sastra into the book for current century.
Coming to the practical side of this, now-a-days it has become a fashion to bring from the past and dance is no exception. Dancers and choreographers are composing something that could have been done in the past with reference to NS. A drama on a chatusra stage with only Bharati as its vritti has become a fashion. A dance ballet with the usage of all four vrittis, choosing any of the dasaroopaka, usage of old instruments has now become the trend.
With no exception, dance has also undergone mighty change over the period and yes it is natural but to adopt. The wonderful part about Indian Classical dancing is, it still holds tight to its root while the branches are spreading like a giant in different directions in various ways.
With no exception, dance has also undergone mighty change over the period and yes it is natural but to adopt. The wonderful part about Indian Classical dancing is, it still holds tight to its root while the branches are spreading like a giant in different directions in various ways.
Here I am posting a link below of Rama Vaidyanathan's tri-kaala jathi of Varnam, swami naan undhan adimei. I would like you to notice a couple of things here :
1. The structure of the Jathi, simple and a long one.
2. The steps - modern yet traditional.
3. compare it to her performance today - a sea of change in sollu kattu, dancing, adavus!